Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The CPAL is an OSI approved license.
How is that relevant to Debian?
Also: please don't top post, nor quote huge messages to post a
single-line response.
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct>.
--
\ "Holy contributing to the
On 9/15/07, Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The CPAL is an OSI approved license.
Debian, as well as the FSF, has rejected many OSI-approved licenses before.
(Being OSI-approved does of course mean you've come most of the way to
being DFSG-free, but a lot of OSI approved licenses
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:19:35PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:39:49 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> [...]
> > excellent explanation!
> In other words, IIUC, this clause seems to try and limit the harms done
> by some idiotic laws.
> The license would *not* be *less* re
Joerg Mayer wrote:
Hello List,
I've some doubts whether it is OK to distribute binaries of GPL programs
linked against libpcap. Being one of the Wireshark (nee Ethereal)
authors that's something I'd like to hear some (hopefully well founded)
opinions on.
While the main license file says it's 3
Hello List,
I've some doubts whether it is OK to distribute binaries of GPL programs
linked against libpcap. Being one of the Wireshark (nee Ethereal)
authors that's something I'd like to hear some (hopefully well founded)
opinions on.
While the main license file says it's 3 clause BSD, some of t
On Friday 14 September 2007 10:38:40 Steve King wrote:
> This is David Coffin's proposed license text for the next version of
> dcraw: No license is required to download and use dcraw.c. However, to
> lawfully redistribute dcraw, you must either (a) offer, at no extra
> charge, full source code* f
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:39:49 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
[...]
> excellent explanation!
In other words, IIUC, this clause seems to try and limit the harms done
by some idiotic laws.
The license would *not* be *less* restrictive without this clause.
Is that correct?
--
http://frx.netsons.or
This is David Coffin's proposed license text for the next version of dcraw:
No license is required to download and use dcraw.c. However,
to lawfully redistribute dcraw, you must either (a) offer, at
no extra charge, full source code* for all executable files
containing RESTRICTED func
The CPAL is an OSI approved license.
Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
On 9/13/07, Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* License : (CPAL)
Seems like another MPL-based license. Any volunteers for reviewing it?
(I don't have time atm.)
Differen
Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
> On 9/13/07, Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * License : (CPAL)
>
> Seems like another MPL-based license. Any volunteers for reviewing it?
> (I don't have time atm.)
Differences from the MPL, found with a wdiff:
> 3.6 Distr
10 matches
Mail list logo
