Re: uploading GPLv3 packages

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:42:03 +1000 Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is it legal to upload a package with GPLv3 license right now? > > It's always legal to upload it anywhere, because the license gives you > the permission to do that (provi

Re: uploading GPLv3 packages

Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it legal to upload a package with GPLv3 license right now? It's always legal to upload it anywhere, because the license gives you the permission to do that (provided you comply with the rest of the terms). Whether a GPLv3 work is distributable com

uploading GPLv3 packages

Hi, Just a simple question which the previous threads about GPLv3 didn't solve for me or I was unable to see the answer, anyway: Is it legal to upload a package with GPLv3 license right now? thanks in advance, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Good day to deal with

Questions about the "Unicode Terms of Use"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to package [0] a software that contains a file [1] from unicode.org. The copyright / license notice is : > Copyright (C) 1999-2005, ASMUS, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distributed > under the Terms of Use in http://www.unicode.org/copy

Re: Bacula and OpenSSL

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael, Anthony I just wanted to let you know that I have forwarded your comments and feedback regarding GPLv3, OpenSSL and System Libraries to Brett Smith, licence engineer at FSF. :) Regards Shane - -- Shane Coughlan FTF Coordinator Free Soft

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 10:56:41 pm Walter Landry wrote: > > The problem is that we are then gambling with other people's money. > > Coupling that with the wide range of wacky things that copyright > > holders have done in the past makes me consider any d