On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:33:44 +0100 Gervase Markham wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Bad: no clear definition of remote users
> >
> > The term "user" is not clearly defined.
>
> Is your point that it is impossible to clearly define, or do you have
> alternative language?
I cannot have
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:24:43 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 23:57 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> > > (if your version supports
> > > such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding
> > > Source of your version by providing access to copy the
> > > Correspo
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:28 + Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Hello -legal,
>
> I recently came across Knowledgetree which is a web-based document
> management system. There is a (very old) version of it currently in
> Debian that is licensed under the GPL2. However, it seems that newer
> versions ar
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 23:57 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> > (if your version supports
> > such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source
> > of your version by providing access to copy the Corresponding Source
> > from a network server at no charge.
>
> Bad: use re
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Incidentally, what part of the DFSG is the Dissident test supposed
> to help test against?)
http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html#dissident>
I believe it tests against DFSG§5, "No Discrimination Against Persons
or Groups".
http://www.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>(Incidentally, what part of the DFSG is the Dissident test supposed to
>help test against?)
The imaginary clause.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Francesco Poli wrote:
Bad: no clear definition of remote users
The term "user" is not clearly defined.
Is your point that it is impossible to clearly define, or do you have
alternative language?
Do you know how the corresponding clause in the current Affero license
has historically
7 matches
Mail list logo
