"Anthony W. Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Ben Finney writes:
> >"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> What character encoding should be used?
> >
> >The same encoding as the rest of the file.
>
> And if that encoding is 7-bit ascii ???
Copyright law allows for two cop
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ben Finney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben Finney wrote:
> [the (C) sequence is] possibly not a valid copyright
> indicator. The © symbol is unambiguous under the law, and thus
> preferred.
"unambiguous under the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cord Beermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi.
I want to add a package to Debian with the following
License-Statement:
The Simple PHP Blog is released under the GNU Public License.
It's the GNU *General
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Armstrong
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/14/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Considering the fact that the actual symbol is a white wheelchair on a
>blue background, it's not clear that a black font wo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Giacomo A. Catenazzi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Ben Finney wrote:
Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have heard that in copyright declarations like:
Copyright (C) 2007, Company X, Country Y. All rights reserved.
---
it is incorrect to use (
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shriramana Sharma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
As many people have pointed out, I realize I should be saying
"proprietary" when I used the word "commercial". I also realize that
the GPL does not preclude "commercial" == "for profit" usage. I was
merely echoing the
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> I might package a game created by a teenager, so I wanted to make sure that
> the fact thas she's minor wouldn't be a problem. I don't know if she has
> right to license what she does, or it must be her parents, or something like
> that. Any thoughts on thi
Hi,
I might package a game created by a teenager, so I wanted to make sure that
the fact thas she's minor wouldn't be a problem. I don't know if she has
right to license what she does, or it must be her parents, or something like
that. Any thoughts on this? Is there any difference in her being ov
Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
> I remember reading that the GFDL is not DFSG-free (due to some clauses
> regarding invariant sections or something) so I would like to know what
> is a DFSG-free license for documentation, since a project I am working
> on wants to license its docum
Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> 1. The GPLv3: the latest draft did not raise major objections from
> -legal and despite its concerns with the strategies developed in some
> sections, Debian does consider it DFSG-free. [...]
A big one of those concerns is the way it combines ba
10 matches
Mail list logo
