Re: Request licence review

2007-05-03 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 2 May 2007 19:57:25 -0600 Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > On Wednesday 02 May 2007 11:13:48 Andrew Sidwell wrote: [...] > > Distribution of all other altered > > copies is permitted as long as credit for previous authors is > > maintained, the contact information is replaced with that of the >

Re: Request licence review

2007-05-03 Thread Ben Finney
Andrew Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > Andrew Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Redistribution of unaltered copies of this document is permitted > >> without restriction. Distribution of altered copies is permitted > >> without restriction as long as the alterat

Re: Request licence review

2007-05-03 Thread Andrew Sidwell
Ben Finney wrote: > Andrew Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'd really like to adopt a new manual, but it's by someone we can't >> contact, and it's under a custom licence: >> >> Redistribution of unaltered copies of this document is permitted without >> restriction. Distribution of alter

Re: GCC's manpage refers to sections that aren't in the manpage

2007-05-03 Thread MJ Ray
Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm rather confused. The GCC maintainers put the manpage in non-free > along with the rest of the GCC docs. The manpage says at the bottom > that it's covered by the GFDL and mentions invariant sections that > aren't in the manpage. Huh? What does this