Hello,
At the end of this mail is the result of my attempt to distill the
SleepyCat license into the the MIT license template (everything is
same as MIT license except the conditions paragraph in the middle).
This license satisfies my ethical needs (attribution + share-alike)
and seems to be easi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 03:56:40PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:48:05AM -0400, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 05 avril 2007 à 1
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:48:05AM -0400, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 05 avril 2007 à 19:33 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > Basically, it says the binaries are not distributable, and that the
> > > so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 avril 2007 à 19:33 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > Basically, it says the binaries are not distributable, and that the
> > source is under MPL only. MPL is not DFSG free.
Le jeudi 05 avril 2007 à 19:33 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> Basically, it says the binaries are not distributable, and that the
> source is under MPL only. MPL is not DFSG free.
I don't think the MPL is not DFSG-free. It is just that we are not able
to comply with it.
--
.''`.
: :' : We
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:59 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Steve Langasek:
>
> >> Sorry, I fail to see how you can do this without losing your
> >> credibility. The MIT license specifically gives one permission "to
> >> deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> >>
* Steve Langasek:
>> Sorry, I fail to see how you can do this without losing your
>> credibility. The MIT license specifically gives one permission "to
>> deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
>> the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish" etc.
>
> What rock
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 01:24 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:21:55AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek:
>
> > > Please escalate this to the DPL and/or SPI. He certainly doesn't have a
> > > legal right to use that logo,
>
> > Huh? It's about to be relice
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:33:00AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> > Please escalate this to the DPL and/or SPI. He certainly doesn't have a
> >> > legal right to use that logo,
> >> Huh? It's about to be relicensed under the MIT license.
> > And enforced as a trademark, which he's currently
* Steve Langasek:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:21:55AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Steve Langasek:
>
>> > Please escalate this to the DPL and/or SPI. He certainly doesn't have a
>> > legal right to use that logo,
>
>> Huh? It's about to be relicensed under the MIT license.
>
> And enforced
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:21:55AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Steve Langasek:
> > Please escalate this to the DPL and/or SPI. He certainly doesn't have a
> > legal right to use that logo,
> Huh? It's about to be relicensed under the MIT license.
And enforced as a trademark, which he's cu
* Steve Langasek:
> Please escalate this to the DPL and/or SPI. He certainly doesn't have a
> legal right to use that logo,
Huh? It's about to be relicensed under the MIT license.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
12 matches
Mail list logo
