Re: Swiftfox license

2007-04-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:57:25PM -0400, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:03:20AM -0500, Kilz _ wrote: > > Hi Debian legal > > I am writing you to ask a question that someone I know doesnt believe. It > > has to do with the Swiftfox license. Can you please c

Re: Swiftfox license

2007-04-05 Thread Michael Pobega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:03:20AM -0500, Kilz _ wrote: > Hi Debian legal > I am writing you to ask a question that someone I know doesnt believe. It > has to do with the Swiftfox license. Can you please confirm or deny that it > passes the DFSG? Tha

Re: Copyleft variation of MIT license

2007-04-05 Thread Suraj N. Kurapati
Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > So if you mix your code (under whatever licence you choose, provided > it's compatible with the GPL), together with other peoples' GPL code, > together with other peoples' code under GPL-compatible licences such as > MIT, then... > > You can distribute the whole lot AS

Re: Swiftfox license

2007-04-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:03:20AM -0500, Kilz _ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Debian legal > I am writing you to ask a question that someone I know doesnt believe. It > has to do with the Swiftfox license. Can you please confirm or deny that it > passes the DFSG? Thanks. I say it doesnt, but h

Swiftfox license

2007-04-05 Thread Kilz _
Hi Debian legal I am writing you to ask a question that someone I know doesnt believe. It has to do with the Swiftfox license. Can you please confirm or deny that it passes the DFSG? Thanks. I say it doesnt, but he requires proof. Thanks. Here is the license. SWIFTFOX LICENSE AND RESTR