On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:03:52 +0100 Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> Francesco Poli escribe:
> > "The preferred form for making modifications" does *not* imply that
> > there's no other form (more or less) suitable for modifying the
> > work. It just means that the source is the *preferred* one..
On 3/13/07, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually I understand that the ftpmasters have approved content licensed
under CC 3.0
I assume you mean that CC-licensed content has been accepted into
main. Could you please give some examples of packages where this is
the case?
Cheers,
--
Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the difference that the programmer needs what he's programming to
> *work* according to a suite of specs. Meanwhile the artist doesn't
> need anything to *work* in any physical way.
>
> So yes programming is more or less creative but creat
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> MJ Ray escribe:
> > Both of the situations are biased - each person will probably think their
> > preferred occupation is more creative or worthwhile. If they thought
> > otherwise, they'd probably be doing the other task. Why is this news
>
MJ Ray escribe:
> Both of the situations are biased - each person will probably think their
> preferred occupation is more creative or worthwhile. If they thought
> otherwise, they'd probably be doing the other task. Why is this news
> to anyone?
With the difference that the programmer needs wha
Francesco Poli escribe:
> "The preferred form for making modifications" does *not* imply that
> there's no other form (more or less) suitable for modifying the work.
> It just means that the source is the *preferred* one...
>
> People may and do modify compiled programs using hex editors and/or
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
