Great, there are 996 songs under CC-by (2.0+2.5) if I just look at
dogmazic.net.
Thank you, that's a clear answer. Now I can go ahead! :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/9/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For a lot of wifi cards (dunno about Intel's) it's regulatory - they
> can't sell cards that can be easily modified to exceed FCC limits, so
> they limit it in a binary firmware. If they gave away the source,
> people could easily modify the
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:34:32 -0500 Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > "We would really love to be more permissive, but we cannot, 'cause
> > that other evil guy forbids us."
> >
> > As I keep reading answers like this, I'm less and less convinced of
> > their good faith..
On Thu, Mar 8, 2007 at 15:34:32 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> For some companies I would agree, but as has been said, intel has been
> opensourcing a lot lately, and as that FAQ says, later versions are
> free, which shows they must have some concern.
>
s/free/distributable/
None of the ip
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:46:05 +1000 Kel Modderman wrote:
>
>
>> On Thursday 08 March 2007 04:23, Francesco Poli wrote:
>>
> [...]
>
>>> However, the license does not meet the DFSG (it's not even close to
>>> meeting them...): has Intel been contacted and asked to pr
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:46:05 +1000 Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2007 04:23, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > However, the license does not meet the DFSG (it's not even close to
> > meeting them...): has Intel been contacted and asked to provide the
> > firmware (with source code) in a
Mathieu Stumpf escribe:
> Well, all that is great, but what should I understand with all that, is
> there no license under which I can find songs that debian would accept
> in the main repository?
>
AFAIK CC-by would allow it.
> Please make a short and clear answer. :)
Hopefully mine is. :)
No
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My opinion is based on the contribution of debian-legal participants, of
> the workgroup participants, and of my own review of the licenses.
I don't doubt that. However, that's still your opinion rather than the
Workgroup's. I don't mean anything bad by that.
Well, all that is great, but what should I understand with all that, is
there no license under which I can find songs that debian would accept
in the main repository?
Please make a short and clear answer. :)
9 matches
Mail list logo
