Re: GFDL with no invariants/covers, is ok?

2007-02-25 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:09:05PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > make package had stripped all of the documentation due to GFDL. remake's > author doesn't mind bending licensing for his own .texi file (used for > ..info etc) specific for debugging facilities of remake. He > suggested following

GFDL with no invariants/covers, is ok?

2007-02-25 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Dear Legal People, I am in the process of making package for remake ready (which is a branch from make which allows improved debugging etc... ITP#411174) make package had stripped all of the documentation due to GFDL. remake's author doesn't mind bending licensing for his own .texi file (used for

[Fwd: Re: [cc-licenses] Comments on the latest public CC draft]

2007-02-25 Thread Evan Prodromou
I answered Francesco on cc-licenses, and I thought it'd be useful to forward the answers here, too. ~Evan --- Begin Message --- On Sun, 2007-25-02 at 19:16 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > In a recent message[1] to the cc-licenses list, a new draft of CC-v3.0 > licenses was announced. I don't bel

Re: Comments on the latest public CC draft

2007-02-25 Thread Ben Finney
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:05:22 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > > Are there any differences between this draft and CC3.0 Final? > > I've just been told (both privately and on cc-licenses) that the > final texts are out. I didn't know that while I was wa

Re: Comments on the latest public CC draft

2007-02-25 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:05:22 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 2/26/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > In a recent message[1] to the cc-licenses list, a new draft of > > CC-v3.0 licenses was announced. The message included one document > > as attachment: BY-SA v 3

Re: Comments on the latest public CC draft

2007-02-25 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 2/26/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all! In a recent message[1] to the cc-licenses list, a new draft of CC-v3.0 licenses was announced. The message included one document as attachment: BY-SA v 3 (020907) (US).pdf [1] http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2007-Febr

Comments on the latest public CC draft

2007-02-25 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi all! In a recent message[1] to the cc-licenses list, a new draft of CC-v3.0 licenses was announced. The message included one document as attachment: BY-SA v 3 (020907) (US).pdf [1] http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2007-February/005013.html I've just sent my comments on that dra