On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Jeff Carr wrote:
> On 01/30/07 11:54, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> >>Just pointing out that it doesn't break our ability to
> >>redistribute under the GPL.
> >
> >This refrain keeps getting repeated, but still no one has explained
> >how di
On 01/30/07 11:54, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
Just pointing out that it doesn't break our ability to
redistribute under the GPL.
This refrain keeps getting repeated, but still no one has explained
how distributing a form of the work which is _not_ the prefere
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:11:58 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote:
> I really mean upstream in the sense that
> it's used in Debian packaging, where it means whoever is modifying and
> distributing modifications that we use and distribute further. If
> upstream is holding back information from us that they a
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
4 matches
Mail list logo
