Re: creative commons

2007-01-05 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 10:48:11 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 1/6/07, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > > > I want some feedback on the compatibility of creative commons 2.5 > > and Debian. > > > > I read that v 2.0 is not compatible ... how about 2.5? are there > > variants tha

Re: creative commons

2007-01-05 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 1/6/07, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello I want some feedback on the compatibility of creative commons 2.5 and Debian. I read that v 2.0 is not compatible ... how about 2.5? are there variants that are and some that are not ... or ... they are not at all? At the moment it's bel

creative commons

2007-01-05 Thread Luis Matos
Hello I want some feedback on the compatibility of creative commons 2.5 and Debian. I read that v 2.0 is not compatible ... how about 2.5? are there variants that are and some that are not ... or ... they are not at all? thank you Luis Matos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Python Software Foundation trademark policy

2007-01-05 Thread Terry Hancock
Gervase Markham wrote: > The Python Software Foundation trademark policy[0] says the following: > > "# Use of the word "Python" when redistributing the Python programming > language as part of a freely distributed application -- Allowed. If the > standard version of the Python programming language

Re: Acknowledgment clause in GPL code?

2007-01-05 Thread Terry Hancock
Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote: > I'm curious as to the status of the following code for solving a > Rubik's cube: > > http://www.wrongway.org/work/solver.tar.gz > > The readme.txt file states > > This program is released under the GNU General Public License. > It may be modified and/