On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 06:04:21PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> AFAIK, in many jurisdictions, in regards to copyright circumvention it
> is often determined on the basis of 'is there any commercially viable
> legal use?' rather than 'is there any legal use?'. Did anyone
> *
On 1/4/07, Masayuki Hatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>"Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Password cracking in itself has always been legal AFAIK.
> Using password crackers to crack other peoples systems without
> permission (ie. illegally ob
Hi,
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Password cracking in itself has always been legal AFAIK.
> Using password crackers to crack other peoples systems without
> permission (ie. illegally obtaining access) is definitely illegal.
> There are leg
Password cracking in itself has always been legal AFAIK.
Using password crackers to crack other peoples systems without
permission (ie. illegally obtaining access) is definitely illegal.
There are legitimate uses for tools like djohn, eg. for security
testing, for data recovery, etc.
On 1/4/07,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was checking some old RFP's and I find this one. Is a little program
that distribute the job of cracking passwords using John the Ripper.
I think this is not totally legal to be packaged officially for Debian.
Jose Luis,
P.S. Please CC me you
I don't know if it is a good program because it have images from "Mario"
(a trademark of Nintendo[1]). I'm sending one copy of this email to
debian-legal. On the other hand, if somebody wants to package a SMC
please look if it is possible, because it have copyright license.
[1] - http://mario
6 matches
Mail list logo
