Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Then, I believe that sites that offer user-contributed images are
substantially violating the GPL, although 'bona fide'. What's your
opinion?
It would seem that the FSF takes action against such distribution, even
though no harm was intended by the distributors.
MEPIS,
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:01:08 + (UTC) Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The FAQ even says:
>
> Q: How does this announcement affect Java EE?
> A: Sun's implementation of Java EE 5 has been available as open-source
> under the CDDL license through the GlassFish Community since June of
> 2005. In order to g
Lewis Jardine catbox.co.uk> writes:
>
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I would like to
> > encourage people to email him whenever they spot things like the
> > "nuclear clause" in packages from Sun which prevent them going into
> > main.
>
> I thought the nuclear clause was merely an observation, an
Tom Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed allow me to appeal to everyone to reconsider CDDL *as is*
> given the clarification that Simon has provided in this regard [1].
In essence, this is the same claim we have heard before:
"If, however, you are an individual, or a company that trades i
The main focus is on the comprehensive new possibilities for analysing
emailing campaigns.
They are also good for cooler weather because generally the fingers
become the coldest due to touching the metal brake levers. There is such
a large selection of panniers that I will point you to the right p
Lewis Jardine wrote:
> I think you've missed a post in this thread, in which Francesco
Poli
> observes that Debian is not offering to distribute source code
(2b), but
> instead 'offering equivalent access to copy the source code from
the
> same place', which 'counts as distribution of the sourc
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Thank you. Two more questions:
1) Does it make any difference if it is a [hard]disk image or an
installation cd?
Not from the GPL's point of view: you're still distributing a GPL work,
whether or not it's been installed. But there might be some differences
in the exact
Mark Wielaard wrote:
I would like to
encourage people to email him whenever they spot things like the
"nuclear clause" in packages from Sun which prevent them going into
main.
I thought the nuclear clause was merely an observation, and thus not a
restriction? I.E. Java is not licensed for use
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006, Tom Marble wrote:
> Once the the full JVM is available under GPL then running applications
> on top of it *are* compatible with any license as this was the specific
> rationale for adding the Classpath exception [1].
I think it can even go in "contrib" if it end
9 matches
Mail list logo
