Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-26 Thread Michael Poole
Ben Finney writes: > Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Ben Finney writes: >> > Likewise, if a program will behave markedly differently in the >> > absence of a firmware program, to the point that it becomes >> > useless without it, it's still the same program; but it still >> > depend

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-26 Thread Ben Finney
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney writes: > > Likewise, if a program will behave markedly differently in the > > absence of a firmware program, to the point that it becomes > > useless without it, it's still the same program; but it still > > depends on that firmware program.

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-26 Thread Michael Poole
Ben Finney writes: > Likewise, if a program will behave markedly differently in the absence > of a firmware program, to the point that it becomes useless without > it, it's still the same program; but it still depends on that firmware > program. Various programs in main behave markedly different

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-26 Thread Ben Finney
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney writes: > > Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I am saying that the driver does not "depend" on the firmware > >> because its functionality does not change if the firmware is > >> uploaded or not to the hardware device. In both situ

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-26 Thread Michael Poole
Ben Finney writes: > Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I am saying that the driver does not "depend" on the firmware because >> its functionality does not change if the firmware is uploaded or not to >> the hardware device. In both situations the driver is the same program, > > "is the

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-26 Thread Ben Finney
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am saying that the driver does not "depend" on the firmware because > its functionality does not change if the firmware is uploaded or not to > the hardware device. In both situations the driver is the same program, "is the same program" != "functional

Re: font presents in http://www.webpagepublicity.com

2006-10-26 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Olive wrote: > The page mentioned in the subject contains high quality fonts. [...] > > Digital Font Labs - Copyright (c) , 2000. .. FREEWARE ... Use > this font at your own free will. > > But this seems to beautiful to be true, so does anyone know more about > this website? Is the above

Re: main or contrib?

2006-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Are you saying that this is roughly equivlent to something like a firmwae >uploading utility for a proprietory PDA? (That sounds like something that >could go in main). I am saying that the driver does not "depend" on the firmware because its functionality does not chang

Re: Help with bug #285156 - Non free translation

2006-10-26 Thread Amaya
Please disregard this message, as: Jakub Nadolny wrote: > Polish translation is already free, I have discussed it on > debian-legal and I have contacted Zbigniew Becker, author of Polish > translation. He agreed to use this as "license": Creative Commons > Public Domain Dedication > http://creativ

Help with bug #285156 - Non free translation

2006-10-26 Thread Amaya
I have downloaded the latest source from upstream: http://freshmeat.net/redir/display-dhammapada/41408/url_tgz/display-dhammapada-0.23.tar.gz The polish translation now states this: This publication is not copyrighted. One can copy it and use any part of it with mentioning the source. Publishers

Re: Freeness of a license - french

2006-10-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:14:04AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > Can anyone tell me if the "Art Libre" license ( > http://moleinvasion.tuxfamily.org/download/snd/LICENSE.txt ) might be > considered DFSG-free? It's written in french, and although I can more or less > understand a part of it, I'm inca