En/na Weakish Jiang ha escrit:
>> Of course, they aren't sufficient to grant it. But the fact that only
>> GPL is mentioned, terms of use requiring the same license, alternative
>> arragements apparently not made... overall they give me the impression
>> that the artwork may be free enough.
>
> Te
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote:
> I would like to change the license to LGPL. The problem here is,
> that the mysql-driver links with mysql, which is GPL. Does this GPL
> of mysql mean, that tntdb needs to be GPL also?
No; the LGPL is always compatible with the GPL. [You can always remo
Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> That's right, but in this case "OSI-approved license applicable to such
> Source Code" means GPL, AFAIU.
>
Yes, in this case, the source code is under GPL, but the copyright owner
said nothing about content on webpages.
> Of course, they aren't sufficient to grant
En/na Weakish Jiang ha escrit:
>
>> "Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is
>> subject to the sole editorial control of the owner or licensee of such
>> subdomain, shall be subject to the OSI-approved license applicable to
>> such Source Code, or to such other licensing a
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > By the way, are there still a few countries not in the Berne Union? Maybe
> > copyright isn't completely cross-jurisdiction, but it seems near enough.
>
> The only "real" country left is Taiwan, and it's mostly bec
Javier Serrano Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[artwork on sf.net, OSTG terms say it's all under the main licence]
> Should I contact the author in any case?
Yes, as that would probably be simplest if it is done amicably.
> If I don't receive any reply, does that paragraph grant a DFSG usage?
I
Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
I've read
> the sourceforge's terms of use and got to this paragraph under the
> licensing section:
>
> "Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is
> subject to the sole editorial control of the owner or licensee of such
> subdomain, shall be subj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>When I think about it: Since there is no object code in the
>libmail-domainkeys-perl or libmail-dkim-perl binary packages, there shouldn't
>be any problems with GPL as far as *these* packages are concerned.
Did you notice my answer? I already explained the issue.
--
c
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> By the way, are there still a few countries not in the Berne Union? Maybe
> copyright isn't completely cross-jurisdiction, but it seems near enough.
The only "real" country left is Taiwan, and it's mostly because the rebels
in the mainland
(With apologies to Tommi if he's subscribed to -legal already.)
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:47:49AM +0200, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the author of tntdb - a C++ class library for easy database access, which
I'm the DD who just uploaded it to the archive - I won't say "the
maintainer" u
Hi,
I'm the author of tntdb - a C++ class library for easy database access, which
is on the list of prospective packages for debian. Currently the license is
GPL with this famous openssl-clause, because a part of it (the
postgresql-driver) links against postgresql-libraries, which link against
On Friday 25 August 2006 01:57, Stephen Gran took the opportunity to say:
> So, if the domain keys patent is under active enforcement, this software
> probably should not be approved by the ftp masters. If it is not under
> active enforcement, and is under a free license, there is no reason not
>
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:19, MJ Ray took the opportunity to say:
> Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:15, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to
say:
> > > I sent a "clarification request" using their feedback form a couple of
> > > weeks ago. Still no
Not quite contradicting what was written, but it isn't quite so simple...
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trademarks are a no-op. The DFSG allows for name-change clauses (DFSG 4).
> This allows us to modify and redistribute without infringing trademarks
> if need be. No freedom issue h
14 matches
Mail list logo
