Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions

2006-08-12 Thread Evan Prodromou
On Sat, 2006-12-08 at 23:05 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Not a good start. :-( Let me take this opportunity to repeat my plea that people who have feelings about this issue join the cc-licenses mailing list and post messages on the topic. http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-l

Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions

2006-08-12 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:26:13 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote: > So, I have big news and a big question. > > Big news > > > Creative Commons has announced the public draft of the next version of > their license suite: > > http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/6017 [...] > http://evan.prodr

Re: DFSG as Licence?

2006-08-12 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:36:40 +0200 Michelle Konzack wrote: [...] > I was thinking to use the term: > > Licence: This software is under any Licence which complay > with the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG). > [...] > What do you think about it? There are some major problems with s

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-12 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Saturday 12 August 2006 14:34 pm, you wrote: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Saturday 12 August 2006 02:47 am, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > According to the GPL, section 0: > >> > > >> > The act of running the Program i

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-12 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 12 August 2006 02:47 am, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > According to the GPL, section 0: >> > >> > The act of running the Program is not restricted... >> > >> > And since dynamic linking is

Re: cdrtools

2006-08-12 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Saturday 12 August 2006 02:47 am, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > According to the GPL, section 0: > > > > The act of running the Program is not restricted... > > > > And since dynamic linking is done at the time the program is run, this > > would a

Re: DFSG as Licence?

2006-08-12 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 8/12/06, Weakish Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Michelle Konzack wrote: > I was thinking to use the term: > > Licence: This software is under any Licence which complay > with the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG). > > I am thinking, that this makes my standpoint more clear a