Re: Would cxxtools need an exception for libssl too?

On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kari Pahula wrote: > I've an ITP, #366834, on a library called cxxtools (which already > created a bit of controversy on -devel). The reason I'm packaging > cxxtools is because tntnet (ITP #361010) uses it. > > Both are licensed under GPLv2 or later. > > Tntnet links to libs

Re: Would cxxtools need an exception for libssl too?

"Kari Pahula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've an ITP, #366834, on a library called cxxtools (which already created a bit of controversy on -devel). The reason I'm packaging cxxtools is because tntnet (ITP #361010) uses it. Both are licensed under GPLv2 or la

Would cxxtools need an exception for libssl too?

I've an ITP, #366834, on a library called cxxtools (which already created a bit of controversy on -devel). The reason I'm packaging cxxtools is because tntnet (ITP #361010) uses it. Both are licensed under GPLv2 or later. Tntnet links to libssl, which is GPL-incompatible. Upstream already added