On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:59:36 -0400 Charles Fry wrote:
> > As you may have read in the thread you're referring to (I don't know
> > which of them, as there are quite several), I don't agree.
> > I believe that PHP license version 3.01 does not comply
> > with the DFSG, even when applied to PHP itse
This one time, at band camp, Frank Küster said:
> Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stephen Gran wrote:
> >> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:25:54AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> > > >
> > > > THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHO
Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
>>> THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
>>> SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
>> This is possibly problematic, depend
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:25:54AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> > >
> > > THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
> > > SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIF
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Palmer said:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> >
> > THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
> > SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
>
> This is possibly problematic, depending on how you d
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:45:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> > I don't think that the clause is necessarily a problem, though -- it reads
> > to me more like a slightly more emphatic no-warranty clause, rather than a
> > prohibition against use in any particular field.
>
> So what should I d
8 matches
Mail list logo