Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Alex Ross wrote:
>> GPLv3 is available at [1]. The draft removes ambiguities of GPLv2, and
>> in particular, clarifies the old GPLv2 clause 3: "You may copy and
>> distribute the Program ..." During the discussi
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Alex Ross wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> >(d-l may give advice)
> >So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from *every*
> >copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. (the GNU
> >utils would be easier as there is
debian-legal folks: please skim #256332 for history.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:13:30AM -0700, Mike Olson wrote:
> If you're going to rev the packages in any case, I'd strongly
> recommend simply moving to the 4.3 (or better, 4.4) release.
> We would expect no functional problems, you'd get all th
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
(d-l may give advice)
So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from *every*
copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. (the GNU
utils would be easier as there is _usually_ only one copyright holder: FSF)
or OpenSolaris needs to rel
Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc.
andrew
On 4/7/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (d-l may give advice)
>
> So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from
> *every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc.
> (the GNU utils would be e
(d-l may give advice)
So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from
*every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc.
(the GNU utils would be easier as there is _usually_ only one
copyright holder: FSF) or OpenSolaris needs to relicense (impossible
as Sun woul
Jody,
http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/equipollent7795
Bill #6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Lenaerts)
> Am I correct that, in order to be able to export a product using
> Debian GNU/Linux, to countries under US embargo, I would have to
> remove all encryption related material?
The _licenses_ of the various components of Debian main should not
prevent yo
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006, Frank Lenaerts wrote:
> What about companies that also have a site in the US?
If you're subject to US law, you need to obey US law. If you're a
company operating in the US, your US assets may be subject to US law.
If you don't know whether or not you're subject to US law, you
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:07:13PM +0400, olive wrote:
> >>US laws might prevent from doing this if you are a US citizen (or live
> >
> >It think it even goes further i.e. I don't think this is limited to US
> >citizens. As I understand it, nobody (worldwide) is allowed to export
> >anything (free
From previous discussions, I don't think *licenses* can prevent you to
Any pointers to previous discussions?
Don Armstrong answers this on this list the 06 Feb 2006 answered a
similar question that I have posed.
US laws might prevent from doing this if you are a US citizen (or live
It is my understanding that if the U.S. has embargoed
trade with another nation, nothing can be traded,
legally. Also, it has been awhile since I checked the
current export laws on encryption, but at one time no
encryption capabilities could be exported to any
nation in digital form, only book or
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0400, olive wrote:
> Frank Lenaerts wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have been reading http://www.debian.org/legal/cryptoinmain to find
> >out what it takes to create a product using Debian GNU/Linux as
> >operating system. Pointers to more recent information are welcome.
... *license* cannot prevent you ...
Excuse this misleading mistake
Olive
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Lenaerts wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading http://www.debian.org/legal/cryptoinmain to find
out what it takes to create a product using Debian GNU/Linux as
operating system. Pointers to more recent information are welcome.
Am I correct that, in order to be able to export a product using
Debi
Hi,
I have been reading http://www.debian.org/legal/cryptoinmain to find
out what it takes to create a product using Debian GNU/Linux as
operating system. Pointers to more recent information are welcome.
Am I correct that, in order to be able to export a product using
Debian GNU/Linux, to countri
16 matches
Mail list logo
