Re: Is libreludedb DFSG compliant?

2006-01-04 Thread Marco Franzen
Josh Triplett wrote: Mickael Profeta wrote: If you link LibPreludeDB against other code all of which is itself ^^^ licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 dated June 1991 ("GPL v2") or compatible, then you may use LibpreludeDB

Re: Trolltech GPL violation?

2006-01-04 Thread Matthew Garrett
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:08:03 + Matthew Garrett wrote: > > [...] >> While I won't actually try to use this as an argument of fact, the >> majority of people I've spoken to about this don't feel happy about >> declaring the QPL non-free. > > I'm not ha

Re: Trolltech GPL violation?

2006-01-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:08:03 + Matthew Garrett wrote: [...] > While I won't actually try to use this as an argument of fact, the > majority of people I've spoken to about this don't feel happy about > declaring the QPL non-free. I'm not happy either. Still, I declare the QPL non-free, because

Re: Trolltech GPL violation?

2006-01-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 00:29:14 + Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:08:03PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: [...] > > While I won't actually try to use this as an argument of fact, the > > majority of people I've spoken to about this don't feel happy about > > declaring the QPL non

Re: Is libreludedb DFSG compliant?

2006-01-04 Thread Josh Triplett
Mickael Profeta wrote: > If you link LibPreludeDB against other code all of which is itself > licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 > dated June 1991 ("GPL v2") or compatible, then you may use LibpreludeDB > under the terms of the GPL v2,as appearing in the file COPYI