What do you suppose "require" refers to, in "require the use of" (SC#1), if
not "require the use of [in order to be useful]"?
The problem lies in the definition of "useful", which varies from person
to person.
We've had this argument before. Someone claimed that drivers that require
non-
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:20:41PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
> >Shouldn't packages that require something outside the archive, be it
> >free or not, be in contrib?
>
> No. An emulator does not require a game. It is just not particularly useful
> without one.
What do you suppose "require" refers to
"Josselin Mouette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shouldn't packages that require something outside the archive, be it
free or not, be in contrib?
No. An emulator does not require a game. It is just not particularly useful
without one.
Are you saying that a u
dear customer service
i would like to install a automatic door kit
so could you please mail.me some info or price list and also would
you porovide istallation service as well and what will be
the charges. regards ansari at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 18:55 +, Andrew Suffield a écrit :
> main, definitely. There is a thriving community of developers of free
> gameboy games intended to run on these emulators. Don't ask me why, it
> makes no sense as far as I can see, but they're out there. One example
> is here:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>(Please resist the urge to package them just to prove a point, we
>already have enough stuff in the archive with no point at all; their
>mere existence is sufficient)
Not that I disagree with your point, but since when it is?
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
6 matches
Mail list logo
