Re: [tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources

2005-10-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:08:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 03:57:15AM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > > Yes. Can TOG be regarded as the legal successor of the X Consortium? > > > > From > > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/x-faq/part1/section-16.html > > > > > Here

Adobe, PDF, and competition (was: Re: [tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources)

2005-10-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 04:31:18AM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > When Sebastian presented pdftex at Adobe, they had been amazed that > pdftex can do things they cannot do with their own tools (I suppose > that Hans Hagen provided some files). This was years ago, but > meanwhile Thanh provided m

Re: Permission for using the 'Debian' name in a game

2005-10-24 Thread Joe Smith
"MJ Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No. Debian really would prefer that the logo and name never be used in a case needing a trademark licence. [...] Why do you think that? Consider the Debian UK Society, licensed by the

Re: Permission for using the 'Debian' name in a game

2005-10-24 Thread MJ Ray
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. Debian really would prefer that the logo and name never be used in a > case needing a trademark licence. [...] Why do you think that? Consider the Debian UK Society, licensed by the DPL, which trades as Debian at events. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: