David Kastrup wrote:
> One does not need to mention PDFTeX in that context. But remind me:
> just what Adobe tool is replaced or endangered by PDFTeX? Do they have
> a general purpose typesetting program?
Yes, InDesign.
-M-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 04:48:06 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> >>The Zend Engine is licensed to the
> >>PHP Association (pursuant to a grant from Zend that can be
> >>found at http://www.php.net/license/ZendGrant/) for
> >>distribution to you under this lic
Or you can get explicit permission from Debian. :-)
Debian would probably require that you include a bit explaining what
Debian
really is and how to get it, in exchange for using the trademark.
No. Debian really would prefer that the logo and name never be used in a
case needing a trademark
Jutta Wrage wrote:
can you please compare
URL http://www.us.debian.org/legal/cryptoinmain.en.html
with URL http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian/dwww/legal/
cryptoinmain.en.html
I did read that one of the TODOs is to remplace the tables for something
else. Well, in the beginning of that page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.10.2005 um 17:48 schrieb Raúl Fuenzalida:
May be you should add 'valign="top"' to the tags
Sorry, but this would be a new change. Neither neccessary to get it
readable nor to get it HTML strict.
I am working on switching to strict DTD
Jutta Wrage wrote:
URL http://www.us.debian.org/legal/cryptoinmain.en.html
with URL http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian/dwww/legal/
cryptoinmain.en.html
You have the following table:
To:
http://www.spi-inc.org/";>Software in the Public
Interest, http://www.debian.org/";>Debian Proje
://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian/dwww/legal/
cryptoinmain.en.html
The patch is at http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian/diff/
cryptoinmain-20051023.diff
If the questions look okay and there are no objections, I will commit
the change on monday.
greetings
Jutta
- --
http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http
/
cryptoinmain.en.html
The patch is at http://www.witch.westfalen.de/debian/diff/
cryptoinmain-20051023.diff
If the questions look okay and there are no objections, I will commit
the change on monday.
greetings
Jutta
- --
http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http://witch.muensterland.org
-BEGIN PGP
Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
"David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One does not need to mention PDFTeX in that context. But remind
> me: just what Adobe tool is replaced or endangered by PDFTeX? Do
> they have a general purpose typesetting program?
Do people use
Quoting Reinhard Kotucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One does not need to mention PDFTeX in that context. But remind
> > me: just what Adobe tool is replaced or endangered by PDFTeX? Do
> > they have a general purpose typesetting
Hector Blanco wrote:
> Hello.
> My name is Hector Blanco.
> I developed a game called 'Debian vs Pimientos' in which you
> have to kill peppers, using the Debian logo as a ship.
> Well, more info is here:
> http://www.neopontec.com/en/games/index.php?sec=game&gid=1
>
> Some persons commented me
Andreas Rottmann wrote:
>
> [CC'ed debian-legal, they can probably give a more detailed and
> informed analysis of the proposed license]
Done, please forware appropriate information as needed.
>
> Antoon Bosselaers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Dear Sebastian,
>>
>> The conditions of use you
Joey Hess wrote:
> Hector Blanco wrote:
>> My name is Hector Blanco.
>> I developed a game called 'Debian vs Pimientos' in which you
>> have to kill peppers, using the Debian logo as a ship.
>> Well, more info is here:
>> http://www.neopontec.com/en/games/index.php?sec=game&gid=1
>>
>> Some perso
Francesco Poli wrote:
>> The Zend Engine is licensed to the
>> PHP Association (pursuant to a grant from Zend that can be
>> found at http://www.php.net/license/ZendGrant/) for
>> distribution to you under this license agreement, only as a
>> part of PHP. In the event tha
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:21:08PM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
>> > "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe it is sufficient to find someone at X.org who is willing to care
>> about the legal stuff. It is a great advantage that Thanh found
>> so
Ralf Stubner wrote:
> I digged into groups.google.com and found the original press release:
>
>
http://groups.google.de/group/comp.windows.x/browse_thread/thread/d351921a604a4039/a3e406813544b498
>
> Mountain View, Calif. (October 9, 1991) - Adobe Systems Incorporated today
> announced it has do
Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> Hello members of debian-legal,
>
> It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
> Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
> therefore needs to be changed.
We know. ;-)
> Currently web pages are "Copyright © 1997-2005 SPI
Joe Smith wrote:
> Before 1989 (in the US) lack of a copyright notice on an authorized
publication could cause loss of copyright protection if the work was not
registerd within 5 years, and all future versions be published with a correct
notice. As the earliest known version has no copyright not
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Francesco!
>
> You wrote:
>
>> A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply
>> asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked,
>> contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.
>
> I'm afraid that this will turn ou
Martin Koegler wrote:
> The newer MySQL client libraries are GPL (with the FLOSS exception),
> older versions were LGPL.
>
> At http://dev.mysql.com/doc/internals/en/licensing-notice.html
> MySQL has put a descrption of their network protocol, where they
> force programs using this protocol to
20 matches
Mail list logo
