Copyright violation in utils/bsdiff 4.2-1

2005-08-08 Thread Colin Percival
Quoth the changelog for bsdiff 4.2-1: >bsdiff (4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > * Initial Release (Closes: #310736). > * Added text from website into README. ^^^ The text from my website appears as part of bsdiff_4.2-1.diff.gz. My website, as an original cre

Re: Any progress on Debian logos?

2005-08-08 Thread Benj. Mako Hill
> * Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-27 22:13]: > > In this thread[1], the previous DPL (Martin Michlmayr) stated that the > > issue was worked on. > > But I got no more news since that time. > > I told the new DPL back in April what needs to be done. He (or, > really, anyone) just ne

Re: RFS: tvbrowser -- TV-Browser is a java-based TV guide

2005-08-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:41:48 -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > If the package depends on software in non-free it will > just fail to install. Otherwise it will install just fine because it does > not depend on a missing package. > > There is no good reason not to think of contrib as an extention of mai

Re: RFS: tvbrowser -- TV-Browser is a java-based TV guide

2005-08-08 Thread skaller
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 21:09 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > The program will be in contrib because of non-free JDK's, please, have a > look at the Java Trap to understand what the (our) problem is with Java: > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html A perfectly good description of why GPL sof