Michael K. Edwards wrote:
Do you know whether the NSS implementation is being certified at
source code level (a very unusual arrangement) using the sort of
maneuvers mentioned in the Linux Journal article on DMLSS?
I'm not able to say - it's not my area. If you are interested,
news://news.mozi
Office XP - $60
http://bwx.7wtmsopimhpe4qp.racyhiracy0.com
The most onerous slavery is to be a slave to oneself.
Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do practice?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:52:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:03 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:24:27 -0700, NIC Technology Support wrote:
> > >
> > > > Below is a response to your ca
On 6/6/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whoops, I misattributed that message. It's Brett Glass who wrote
> that, NOT Theo de Raadt. :-(
And after Googling Brett Glass briefly, I doubt he has much concrete
evidence to back up his claim that RMS plagiarized Symbolics code. If
h
On 6/6/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P. S. If you think that an FSF vendetta against OpenSSL would be an
> anomaly, or that RMS is purist about copyright law when it comes to
> his own conduct, you might be interested in Theo de Raadt's comments
> at http://www.monkey.org/ope
On 6/6/05, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The implementation of SSL in the Netscape NSS libraries is available
> under the GPL, and I believe certain versions of it have FIPS validation.
> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/fips/
I'm delighted to hear that. It does not
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
Pity the MySQL folks; Progress Software were the ones who encouraged
them to switch to the GPL in the first place, and when that
relationship went bad, they fell right in with the FSF. Switching to
YaSSL is going to cost them when it comes to DoD use of MySQL, since
som
And while we're at it, if you're curious what Eben Moglen gets out of
his relationship to the FSF, you might like to read
http://www.vidomi.com/fsfpop.php . Evidently GPL "violators" retain
him as counsel to write them letters saying that their linking-ban
circumvention schemes qualify as "mere ag
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:24:51PM +0200, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> But would ever bring a lawsuit asserting copyright infringement?
His successors might (perhaps especially if they happen to be eg. native
to such a jurisdiction themselves).
--
Glenn Maynard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
You might also observe the comments at
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=6924 and
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=8508 regarding MySQL's retreat, first
from providing OpenSSL-enabled binaries, and then from referencing
OpenSSL in the server source code. Any bets on whether there was a
quid pro quo
On 6/6/05, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > And I wouldn't like to see Debian swept up in the apparent FSF
> > campaign to marginalize OpenSSL and its maintainers by threatening
> > legal action against anyone who links GPL code (F
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:24:51PM +0200, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> The Netherlands is one. Well, we do have a public domain, but it
> only contains works that by law have no copyright and works whose
> copyright has expired.
So what's wrong with a license like:
You may do anything with this w
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:57:47PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> What's "the public domain" in the context of UK / European law?
I don't know, as I am neither a lawyer nor a European. However, I assume
there is some concept of a work which has passed out of copyright (due
to time limitations)
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And I wouldn't like to see Debian swept up in the apparent FSF
> campaign to marginalize OpenSSL and its maintainers by threatening
> legal action against anyone who links GPL code (FSF copyrighted or
> not) to OpenSSL. (I have not personally bee
M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> astronut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am probably wrong here, since I joined the list in the middle of the
> > discussion, but can't you just put a notice at the top of the code like
> > this?
> >
> > /* This code was written by and is hereby released into the
> > publi
astronut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am probably wrong here, since I joined the list in the middle of the
> discussion, but can't you just put a notice at the top of the code like
> this?
>
> /* This code was written by and is hereby released into the
> public domain */
There are supposedly
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:38:24PM -0400, astronut wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> Jeff King wrote:
>
> >The latter message is from me. I am looking for such a license, as I am
> >trying to avoid ridiculous license propagation. My ideal license
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Jeff King wrote:
>The latter message is from me. I am looking for such a license, as I am
>trying to avoid ridiculous license propagation. My ideal license would
>be in one of two forms:
> - a common PD-ish license for whi
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:03 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:24:27 -0700, NIC Technology Support wrote:
> >
> > > Below is a response to your case number CS3271 submitted to Broadcom
> > > NIC Technology Support.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:33:43PM -0400, Anonymous wrote:
> Perhaps I was not clear that I do not intend to use this licence. I have
> noted that there have been at least ten requests for a licence that has for
> all intents and purposes no restrictions. a public domain licence. I was
> just o
It is better you discuss this with opensource.org's licensediscuss
list. They may suggest you another license which meets your needs
without proliferation.
Perhaps I was not clear that I do not intend to use this licence. I have
noted that there have been at least ten requests for a li
De: Steve Langasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The phrase "For an executable work, complete source code means all
> the source code for all modules it contains" appears in the text
> of GPL section *3*, which is not specific to "works based on the
> Program." Such lack of attention to license deta
Can't draw a straight line? Well...now you can!
http://chien.jqny40jcybj8ykj.haetndhaet9.com
Conversation is food for the soul.
Frailty, thy name is woman!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 matches
Mail list logo
