R e finance before Election when the r a tes will rise!
It is your last chance
http://www.nokhika.com/
You are already approv e d with 3.0 point
Thank you.
Heath L. Pace
---
Nwasteland I duffy bakery. skyhook
it a are spatial are itinerary
not Ybundy us with gum. plaintiff
veto prisma
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:11:17 -0400, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The german law referenced in the bug report seems to be a prohibition
> on certain kinds of propaganda. It does not explicitly forbid the word
> pair in question [though cultural context clearly makes some people
> sensit
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 06:58:05PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >Joey Hess is refusing to do anything about it. Please advise.
>
> This refusal is not on the bug report. Can you verify this?
He refused to remove it in #169163. However, that bug report was "I find
this offensive, take it out!", not "Th
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:45:10PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how far does this extend? Would the same apply if
> there was a "list-archive" set of packages in Debian, containing this
> message ("Sieg Heil!"), or an "important-bug-report-archive", containing
> the text of #277
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:24:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> please refer to #277794. One single line needs to be erased from the
> package because otherwise, the package is unconstitutional in
> Germany (and Austria). I consulted a lawyer about this. She says
> that *theoretically*, a German
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 06:58:05PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> For other -legal contributors, this involves a comedy text filter
> ("kraut" I think) which emits "Sieg Heil" in certain conditions.
The obvious google search with the qualifier site:de seems to indicate
that the presence of these two word
On 2004-10-22 18:24:02 +0100 martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
please refer to #277794. One single line needs to be erased from the
package because otherwise, the package is unconstitutional in
Germany (and Austria). [...]
For other -legal contributors, this involves a comedy text fi
also sprach Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.22.1943 +0200]:
> I don't think Germany's laws about how to properly cover up
> history can possibly make software non-free.
I don't think it's a proper way to cover up history anyway.
> I sympathize with the situation of German mirror
I don't think Germany's laws about how to properly cover up history
can possibly make software non-free.
I sympathize with the situation of German mirror-operators and
developers, but it's not so much a matter of law as policy whether
Debian will remove software from its archive to make some natio
Dear all,
please refer to #277794. One single line needs to be erased from the
package because otherwise, the package is unconstitutional in
Germany (and Austria). I consulted a lawyer about this. She says
that *theoretically*, a German mirror operator could get jail-time
for this. No accusation m
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 11:34:33AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Drivers do not require firmwares, hardware devices require firmwares.
Well, actually, there are cases where the communication between firmware
and driver is tight and both need each other, i.e driver won't work with
another firmware a
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> You're not considering all the cases. It is true that Debian's
>> license to the original works persists. But we won't have a license
>> to the derivative work, because the upstream author didn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Firmwares do not run on the host CPU (they are /data/ for the host
>> system)
>Ah. You seem to be labouring under the misconception that non-program
>data files aren't subject to the same rules for inclusion in main as
>executable programs. That's an incorrect assumptio
13 matches
Mail list logo
