Re: Free Art License

2004-09-30 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:24:46PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > How do you feel about specifying what is *not* the preferred form of > modification ("object code", in GPL parlance)? It's likely to cause problems, too. > I've a number of documents that say "References to "object code" and > "exec

Re: Free Art License

2004-09-30 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 22:27, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:24:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > >The source is defined as "The source code for a work means the > > >preferred > > >form of the work for making modifications to it." > > > > > >It's not always clear what the preferred

Re: Free Art License

2004-09-30 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:09:36AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-10-01 00:37:18 +0100 Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >If so, then I have no idea what you meant; please be more specific > >(ie. > >give an example). [...] > > I gave an example in my previous email and you quoted it.

Re: Free Art License

2004-09-30 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-10-01 00:37:18 +0100 Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If so, then I have no idea what you meant; please be more specific (ie. give an example). [...] I gave an example in my previous email and you quoted it. I think either you are being obtuse, or we cannot communicate about

Re: Free Art License

2004-09-30 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:10:01AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-09-30 04:27:05 +0100 Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:24:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >>>It's not always clear what the preferred form of modification would > >>>be > >>>for a piece of media.

Re: Free Art License

2004-09-30 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-09-30 04:27:05 +0100 Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:24:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: It's not always clear what the preferred form of modification would be for a piece of media. [...] So specify it. That's a very bad idea; it'd merely be *his* preferre

take a look at this carefully

2004-09-30 Thread zula lopez
Very exciting profession. You can process over the internet from anywhere in the world. Become your employer. Work part time or full time. A substantial number of our members earn 5,000US to 12,000US per mo. Outstanding customer support and assistance. http://www.wideselectionproductcorner.