Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 11:02:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> The main author of Plex86 forked his own project (heh) to create the
>> "new" Plex86 effort, and relicensed it under the MIT/X license. He
>> asserted that, as the copyright holder, he has permission to do so.
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 11:02:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> The main author of Plex86 forked his own project (heh) to create the "new"
> Plex86 effort, and relicensed it under the MIT/X license. He asserted that,
> as the copyright holder, he has permission to do so.
>
> But Plex86 included m
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040409]:
> On 2004-04-08 21:34:22 +0100 Henrion Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Last september many websites participated in a web strike against
> >software patents. [...]
>
> Last September some web sites were offline (sorry, "on strike") for
> weeks, makin
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:34:09AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >Last september many websites participated in a web strike against
> >software patents. [...]
>
> Last September some web sites were offline (sorry, "on strike") for
> weeks, making free software supporters waste time looking for
> altern
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004, Robert Millan wrote:
> The main author of Plex86 forked his own project (heh) to create the
> "new" Plex86 effort, and relicensed it under the MIT/X license. He
> asserted that, as the copyright holder, he has permission to do so.
What he has been able to do is relicense the c
Hi!
I believe the "new" Plex86 project, a fork of the original Plex86 which is
currently hosted in Savannah, is in violation of the LGPL license.
The main author of Plex86 forked his own project (heh) to create the "new"
Plex86 effort, and relicensed it under the MIT/X license. He asserted that,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What are the legal ramifications of creating an ISO by adding
> packages (some OSS, some proprietary) to a sarge-i386-netinst.iso?
By point 9 of the DFSG, licenses for software in Debian must not place
restrictions on other software that is distribute
On 2004-04-08 21:34:22 +0100 Henrion Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last september many websites participated in a web strike against
software patents. [...]
Last September some web sites were offline (sorry, "on strike") for
weeks, making free software supporters waste time looking for
What are the legal ramifications of creating an ISO by adding packages (some
OSS, some proprietary) to a sarge-i386-netinst.iso?
Am.bien, Viag.ra, Xan.ax, Phentermine, Val.ium, Pax.il, Vi.oxx, Lip.itor, N.exium
-
Get prescript.ion drugs onl;ine from our offshore phar.macy.,
Hey, I don't care what you wanna use it for, but we've got Xan$ax . no que.stions a
Dear project leaders,
Last september many websites participated in a web strike against
software patents. It helped to persuade the European Parliament to
reconfirm the non-patentability of software and to clearly formulate
a right of publication and interoperation with regard to software.
The EU
Уважаемые господа!
15.04.04 состоится однодневный мастер-класс
по теме : «Хитрости ежедневного руководства».
Цель мастер класса: оценить стиль руководства каждого
участника, научить
изменять стиль руководства в зависимости от характера
подчиненного и решаемой задачи. Участники мероприятия научат
Quoting Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Il mer, 2004-04-07 alle 18:25, W. Borgert ha scritto:
> > Maybe you could change the license to GPL+"special
> > exception", where "special exception" is some statement,
> > that it is always allowed to use the psycopg API for
> > whatever softwar
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:37:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 01:06:05AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > I just had an interesting conversation with an Apple developer
> > (Apple employee) regarding the legal status of the boot sector for
> > oldworld Macs.
> >
> > He
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 08:15:41PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2004, at 01:20, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> >I have a fear suspision that this may be more related to newworld, than
> >the oldworld stuff needed for miboot, which may probably be varying
> >between the different models w
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 01:06:05AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> I just had an interesting conversation with an Apple developer
> (Apple employee) regarding the legal status of the boot sector for
> oldworld Macs.
>
> He pointed out that Darwin runs (and boots) on (at least) the beige
> G3, an
I just had an interesting conversation with an Apple developer
(Apple employee) regarding the legal status of the boot sector for
oldworld Macs.
He pointed out that Darwin runs (and boots) on (at least) the beige
G3, and that's oldworld. I don't know anything about Darwin except
that it's
17 matches
Mail list logo
