On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Fedor Zuev wrote:
> The problem is that many US copyrighed works do not have [legally
> recognized] authors at all.
They all have authors, and they all are legally recognized. If you're
not a legal entity, you can't be an author or a copyright holder by
definition.
> Author !
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
>> Now, the French contributor can sneak something past debian-legal by
>> writing a license text that appears to grant permissions that the
>> contributor has no power to grant. Is that what you want?
>Are you sure the location of the contributor
@ 01/04/2004 11:57 : wrote Rick_Thomas :
In that case, the NetBSD folks may already have the information (and
appropriate releases) that we need to re-implement the boot sector for
miboot. It's worth pursuing!
AFAIK (and I googled around) NetBSD boots from a MacOS program called
Booter. I.e.
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 02:57, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:27:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > IMO we should do a clean-room implementation anyway. 1) Past
> > experiences with Apple have not been very fruitful, just ask the Linux
> > Mac68K hackers.
>
> Well, actuall
** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT **
Sent >>> RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received <<< 550 RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User unknown
Could not deliver mail to this user.
* End of message ***
--- Begin Message ---
stuff about you?
** Me
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 06:48:19PM -0500, Guy wrote:
> The binary data stored in the .c source file is not the preferred source!
I don't know about you, but given the choice of:
1) A binary, hex, or other machine code source that I have right in front
of me;
2) A hypothetical source in a high-lev
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:24:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 02:06:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Huh ? If it would be licenced under the MIT/X11 licence, there is no
> > need for the source code for us to distribute it ?
>
> I was figuring we'd just disassemble
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:27:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> IMO we should do a clean-room implementation anyway. 1) Past
> experiences with Apple have not been very fruitful, just ask the Linux
> Mac68K hackers.
Well, actually, they have been. It is true that Apple has long refused
to giv
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:14:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 02:00:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, the US are mostly the most restrictive (unreasonable) juridiction
> > on this kind of issues, so ...
>
> That's not my experience. The U.S. is very aggressive
9 matches
Mail list logo
