Re: MPlayer reloaded

2004-03-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Diego Biurrun wrote: > We now have a LICENSE file and I hope to have addressed GPL 2a with > the Copyright file. The only concern I'm really aware of is that the Copyright file doesn't address GPL ยง2a. I think it will suffice for Debian's purposes, but the mplayer development

Re: MPlayer reloaded

2004-03-16 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Diego Biurrun wrote: > FYI: No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. > > Branden Robinson writes: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 05:03:09AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > I am Diego Biurrun, the MPlayer documentation maintainer, not to be > > > confused with Gabucino, who has made a few appearances o

Re: Bug#192748: Debian-legal summary of the OPL

2004-03-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > [I readded the bug report to CC despite of the contradicting MFT, > since it doesn't make sense to exclude it] Yeah, I didn't include it because I didn't know what the clone's bug number was going to be... it's included and set appropriately now. >

Re: MPlayer reloaded

2004-03-16 Thread Diego Biurrun
FYI: No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Branden Robinson writes: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 05:03:09AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > I am Diego Biurrun, the MPlayer documentation maintainer, not to be > > confused with Gabucino, who has made a few appearances on this list > > before. I am not

Re: Bug#192748: Debian-legal summary of the OPL

2004-03-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
[I readded the bug report to CC despite of the contradicting MFT, since it doesn't make sense to exclude it] On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:13:14PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > debian-legal has recently reconsidered the OPL and has determined that > it is a license that is not free.[1] > > This mean

Re: MPlayer reloaded

2004-03-16 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 05:03:09AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > I am Diego Biurrun, the MPlayer documentation maintainer, not to be > confused with Gabucino, who has made a few appearances on this list > before. I am not here to start a(nother) flame war. Thanks for your careful and comprehensiv

Re: The MySQL FOSS Exception v0.1

2004-03-16 Thread Andres Salomon
(CC'ing debian-legal for any suggestions they may have, as well) On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 06:40, Zak Greant wrote: > On Thursday, March 11th at 22:58 CET, the MySQL team become the proud > parent of a brand new baby license exception. Birth occurred much > sooner than the estimated deliver date of