On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 05:22:29PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> I wonder if it is still possible for sarge to be released before 7 July
> 2004 (international expiration of US4558302). If not, we could start to
> move GIF/LZW patent encumbered packages from non-free and contrib to
> main.
They wil
* Roland Stigge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040218 18:40]:
> I wonder if it is still possible for sarge to be released before 7 July
> 2004 (international expiration of US4558302). If not, we could start to
> move GIF/LZW patent encumbered packages from non-free and contrib to
> main.
I think this is a g
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> OSI guidelines are very similar to ours (they based from our DFSG).
> It would interessting to find the differences and see if we should
> update our DFSG.
In theory, it might be usefull, but there is a significant difference
between the OSD and t
Matt Palmer wrote:
>Hands up anyone who wants to take on the job of official d-legal summariser.
Heh.
>I can think of a few people who *could* take the job, unfortunately, those
>qualified also tend to be those most qualified in other areas.
Branden would do an *excellent* job. He's probably to
Branden Robinson wrote:
(in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/debian-legal-200402/msg00145.html)
I agree with Branden entirely. Uh, "what he said".
Sorry for the me-too-ism.
--Nathanael
>However, there seem to me to be a few obvious caveats:
>* I would not want to be blamed for bad advice someone else added to
> mine; thus I would want modifications to be indicated;
This is just fine and DFSG-free.
>* I would not want someone else to change my biography provided in the
> "About
Hi,
I wonder if it is still possible for sarge to be released before 7 July
2004 (international expiration of US4558302). If not, we could start to
move GIF/LZW patent encumbered packages from non-free and contrib to
main.
More generally, I hope I'm not the only one aware of the fact that
current
Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader wrote:
* Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-13 04:09]:
Hm, that would involve somebody monitoring the OSI lists, because an
Are the OSI lists public (sorry, cannot check, I'm off-line at the
moment waiting for my plane to Malaga)? Is anyon
* Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-13 04:09]:
> Hm, that would involve somebody monitoring the OSI lists, because an
Are the OSI lists public (sorry, cannot check, I'm off-line at the
moment waiting for my plane to Malaga)? Is anyone from -legal
following them already?
> unsolicited
* Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-12 00:01]:
> > Of course, perhaps the best thing for -legal to do is have people
> > self-nominate themselves to this position, and then have a small
> > vote.
>
> Hmm.. do we really need to have a single person charged with writing
> all of the summa
* Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-12 09:17]:
> Hands up anyone who wants to take on the job of official d-legal summariser.
> I
> can think of a few people who *could* take the job, unfortunately, those
> qualified also tend to be those most qualified in other areas.
>
> I certainly
* Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-11 18:01]:
> I'm willing to take on a position to summarize our discussions,
> and present them to upstream. I think I can do this diplomatically, and
> I have some experience with this. (I was responsible for ironing out
Thanks.
--
Martin Michlma
12 matches
Mail list logo
