Branden Robinson wrote:
> B) Copyright 1985, 1986 The Regents of the University of California.
>All rights reserved.
>
>This code is derived from software contributed to Berkeley by
>James A. Woods, derived from original work by Spencer Thomas
>and Joseph Orost.
>
>Redistributio
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
[SNIP]
>My findings follow. Please feel free to ignore the references
>to DFSG-freeness, which is a concern primarily for the Debian
>project, and my footnote discussion of unpacking a Debian source
>package.
[SNIP]
>If this next part bores you, skip t
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The path to clearing away GPL-incompatibilties due to the BSD
> advertising clause for the entire XFree86 source tree (as of
> XFree86 4.3.0, anyway) seems fairly short. Given that, it seems a
> shame to entrench a similar incompatibility both broadly
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:10:04PM -0500, Leon Shiman wrote:
> - Begin Forwarded Message -
> From: David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [forum] GPL-incompatible license
[...]
> Basically, XFree86 li
On Tuesday February 10 2004 07:32, Don Armstrong wrote:
> First off, debian-legal isn't really a place for distributing advice
> on which license to choose, although we can let you know which ones
> are DFSG Free, and which ones are likely to conflict with other
> libraries.
> (...)
Well, the requ
5 matches
Mail list logo
