On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:42:09AM -0800, Michael Adams wrote:
> Can anyone give me an actual example of a project that
> would like to use the JasPer JPEG-2000 codec in a non-interoperable
> way?
Almighty duh of all duhs, JPEG-2010. Even the original authors
probably won't be able to do it, if th
On Sun 4 January 2004 02:55, Roland Stigge wrote:
> since we agreed that the current latex2html license is non-free[1] and I
> moved the package to non-free, the original author (Nikos Drakos) and
> the current maintainer (Ross Moore) signalled willingness to change the
> license. But we possibly n
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> We must look at the entire freeness of a work, not just the copyright
> freeness.
I think this is fine advice.
The Apple Public Source License (APSL) has a clause that makes licensees
choose between continuing to be an APSL licensee and allowing Apple to
infringe on t
On Jan 2, 2004, at 11:00, Walter Landry wrote:
Section 2(b) is just a patent grant. So if a Recipient invokes patent
litigation against a Contributor, then the license effectively becomes
mute about patents. I don't see how that can be DFSG-unfree, since we
have a number of DFSG-free licenses
Hi,
since we agreed that the current latex2html license is non-free[1] and I
moved the package to non-free, the original author (Nikos Drakos) and
the current maintainer (Ross Moore) signalled willingness to change the
license. But we possibly need an agreement from Leeds University. I
prepared a
5 matches
Mail list logo
