Re: Proposal for clarification of DFSG.1

2003-11-10 Thread John Belmonte
Branden Robinson wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:47:28PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:17:06PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > In short, we accept "you may not sell this program alone" clauses, but > only if they have loopholes big enough to make them completely > i

Re: Legality of .DEBS in Medialinux.

2003-11-10 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Marco Ghirlanda wrote: > And if I have to distributer the source, then Knoppix itself it > infringing this? > It seems that my next CD is going to be more GPL compliant, anyway. > At least is what I understand from your answers, Knoppix should be distributing the source from

Re: Legality of .DEBS in Medialinux.

2003-11-10 Thread Marco Ghirlanda
First of all thank you! [Marco: The primary function of this list is to discuss licenses and the legal ramifications of those licenses. As none (or almost none) of us are lawyers, we cannot give legal advice. The following is not legal advice either.] Sorry for expressing myself in the wrong

Re: Legality of .DEBS in Medialinux.

2003-11-10 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Marco: The primary function of this list is to discuss licenses and > the legal ramifications of those licenses. As none (or almost none) of > us are lawyers, we cannot give legal advice. The following is not > legal advice either.] > > As far as we kno

Re: Legality of .DEBS in Medialinux.

2003-11-10 Thread Don Armstrong
[Marco: The primary function of this list is to discuss licenses and the legal ramifications of those licenses. As none (or almost none) of us are lawyers, we cannot give legal advice. The following is not legal advice either.] On Sat, 08 Nov 2003, Marco Ghirlanda wrote: > The fact is that I would

Re: [fielding@apache.org: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0]

2003-11-10 Thread David Turner
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 14:39, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:22:39PM +0530, Mahesh T. Pai wrote: > > Brian M. Carlson said on Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:39:29AM +,: > > > > > I'm not sure that this is even legal, at least in the US. > > > > Will you please clarify why?? >

Re: [fielding@apache.org: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0]

2003-11-10 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:22:39PM +0530, Mahesh T. Pai wrote: > Brian M. Carlson said on Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:39:29AM +,: > > > I'm not sure that this is even legal, at least in the US. > > Will you please clarify why?? I'm assuming you meant the copyright assignment statement, and cert

Re: [fielding@apache.org: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0]

2003-11-10 Thread Mahesh T. Pai
Brian M. Carlson said on Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:39:29AM +,: > I'm not sure that this is even legal, at least in the US. Will you please clarify why?? -- +~+ Mahesh T. Pai, LL.M., 'NA