On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Roger Ward wrote:
> Thanks Henning & Mark for the replies - sorry I had to ask yet again,
> but I use this and hate to not be able to Do What I Want with the
> source. Its sad there is not a way it would work out.
Have you contacted the upstream? It's always possible they'd
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:59:07PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote:
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But does that possibility make the original software non-free? Your
> > argument seems to be that it is possible to make a derived version
> > that is not free - but that possiblity exist
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:04:01PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
> Also, it's surely my fault, but I cannot find any LGPL proof of
> statement in libmysql sources. Could anyone provide it?
> Anyway I asked for clarifications about licensing on 3/4 series.
>
Ok, ok, I was probably sle
Thanks Henning & Mark for the replies - sorry I had to ask yet again, but I use
this and hate to not be able to Do What I Want with the source. Its sad there
is not a way it would work out.
-Roger Ward
Quoting Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Scripsit Roger Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rather than paste the EULA (it has been pasted several times) here is a URL
> which will display it from their webserver:
> http://www.unrealircd.org/downloads.php?eula=1
It says (no, shouts), among other things:
| THE AUTHORS MAINTAIN THE RIGHT TO MODI
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Roger Ward wrote:
> What is the status of the EULA discussion about UnrealIRCd?
Last I heard, it's pretty clearly not distributable, let alone free. It
seems likely they're violating copyright if they're using any code under
the GPL not authored by them.
> The debian bug a
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> If the Base Format itself is free, why is this non-free?
>
> On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 19:29, Mark Rafn wrote:
> > Does this conflict with DFSG#9? This license effectively insists that the
> > Base Format must be free software in order for the Work to be free
What is the status of the EULA discussion about UnrealIRCd? I use this on my
personal machines for a few different purposes, and I'd like to see it supported
in Debian. I am willing to package it, but wanted to request any relevant
comments.
The debian bug archives at http://b.d.o/148319 has a f
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 17:59, Walter Landry wrote:
> I don't think that it is prohibitively complicated. I think it is
> impossible. The LaTeX people can't live with a free license. There
> is too little control.
Well, I suppose there's no convincing someone who has made up their
mind.
--
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 20:49, Walter Landry wrote:
> Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 14:38, Walter Landry wrote:
> > > I get the feeling that this license is being considered only in the
> > > context of LaTeX, not in the context of all of free software. We
> > > c
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 16:50, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Scripsit Brian T. Sniffen
> >> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> >> That's good, but only if you're able to modify the Base
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 19:29, Mark Rafn wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 14:41, Mark Rafn wrote:
> > > It still depends on the platform that runs it to determine whether the
> > > modification is allowed. It may be that this is free when distributed
> > > with a base format that does no such valida
12 matches
Mail list logo
