Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's clear that our basic disagreement is here. I see nothing in
> section 2 that would limit it only to source code.
Correct. Compiling is a form of modification. But are you able to
distribute everything in the object file (including the libraries
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:42:08AM -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote...
> The pornview author has already made a new release that fixes the
> copyright violations and also notified me of this problem with the
> version currently in Debian.
Good. Then I see no reason to pull pornview
Hi Carlos,
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:32:10PM +, Carlos Morgado wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 10:59:55PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >Just one little problem with packaging Balsa 2.0.3 so far. In line
> > with Debian-legal's position, I have to ask for your permission t
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:29:49AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> However, Part 2.1 is a serious concern. "You have the right to copy this
> work of art of your personal use, for your friends or any other person,
> by employing whatever technique you choose." Reading the original
> French, this is
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:42:08AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> "Oliver M. Bolzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GImageView's author's diary pages lists some of the
> > suspicious files and changes (the page is in Japanese)
> > http://www.homa.ne.jp/~ashie/diary/?200212b&to=200212122#200212122
>
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 01:51:59AM -0500, Steven Barker wrote:
> I'm participating in a project that is opening the source of a classic
> game (Star Control 2) and porting it to modern operating systems. The
> code for the game has already been relicensed under the GPL, but the
> game's original
Fuck You.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 03:08:03AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Part of 2.2:
> - specify to the recipient where he will be able to access
> the originals (initial and subsequent). The author of the
> original may, if he wishes, give you the right to broadcast /
> distribute the
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:37:26AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Section 2 says you have the option of changing that source code, and
> then distributing that changed code as in section one (i.e., in source
> form), so long as you note your changes, license under the GPL, and some
> stuff abou
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 10:59:55PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>Just one little problem with packaging Balsa 2.0.3 so far. In line
> with Debian-legal's position, I have to ask for your permission to
> compile and link your software, Balsa with OpenSSL due to their
> advertising
Hi everyone,
Just one little problem with packaging Balsa 2.0.3 so far. In line
with Debian-legal's position, I have to ask for your permission to
compile and link your software, Balsa with OpenSSL due to their
advertising clause. You must also agree to extend the right to use the
OpenSSL featu
On 14 Dec 2002 03:08:03 -0500
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Part 8, I'm sure, will cause problems - it has in the past, but I
> > can't remember in what context; it may just be that some zealots
> > made some hubub a while back that. I don't really recall.
>
> I can't manage to
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 02:29, David B Harris wrote:
> I don't believe part 7 is saying anything additional to what copyright
> law already says; the original author still holds the copyright, even if
> you got the data from friend who got the data from a sister who got the
> data from an aunt who g
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 20:57, Richard Braakman wrote:
> And section 3 specifically says "distribute under
> the terms of Sections 1 and 2", so it can't be more permissive than
> those sections. In fact, it imposes an extra requirement.
That's not quite correct.
Section 1 covers distributing the
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:51:59 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven Barker) wrote:
> I'd like the advice of this list as to whether data under that license
> would be DFSG free. I think the license is a pretty straightforward
> copyleft, though at least the translated version has some unclear
> language.
Hi debian-legal,
I'm participating in a project that is opening the source of a classic
game (Star Control 2) and porting it to modern operating systems. The
code for the game has already been relicensed under the GPL, but the
game's original authors (who hold copyright) have not yet picked a
lic
16 matches
Mail list logo
