On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:38:10AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 01:00:26PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:28:30PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > The specific wording of the GPL
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 01:00:26PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:28:30PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > The specific wording of the GPL grants an exception for linking binaries
> > > against GPL-inc
Hi,
On 12 Oct 2002, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> Congratulations on making the front page of Slashdot.
Wow. :)
> Qt is currently dual-licensed; you can choose the terms of the QPL or
> the GPL. If you choose the terms of the GPL, then there is obviously no
> contradiction with the terms of the GPL.
Congratulations on making the front page of Slashdot.
I noticed in the lkml thread that there was some concern about the use
of Qt as the toolkit for lkc. Since Debian was one of the prime movers
behind the anti-Qt movement in the past, I feel that we should respond
to this.
Qt is currently dual
> There have been a few revisions of the APSL. Please provide us with a
> pointer to the one you're talking about.
I am talking about the latest revision (1.2) available here :
http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/
Thanks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Licquia wrote:
> To clarify Steve's otherwise excellent reply: recent gnutls ships with
> an OpenSSL compatibility library. The libraries are LGPL, so there
> should be no problem with compatibility.
>
> I haven't tried it yet, but I intend to with CUPS. I'd recommend you
> give it a try.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:28:20PM +0200, Manuel Sabban wrote:
> APSL is not considered free by the Free Software Fundation but I haven't
> found in the archives of this list anything about the policy of Debian
> for this license. Is it considered free enough for Debian ?
>
> I am not on the list,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:03:47PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> ECC itself is not patent encumbered, but the most popular curves are.
> These curves (mathematical equations, essentially) are patented by
> Certicom, not Sun. It's like patenting a (p, q) pair for DSA or Elgamal,
> except that the
OGGETTO:
Per lui, per lei, per gay
Stiamo informando il popolo di internet italiano,
che il nostro staff composto da giovani donne e
giovani uomini dai 18 anni in su, hanno aperto
un nuovissimo sito, esclusivamente in lingua italiana, e
frequentato da persone italiane.
Il nostro sito รจ il megl
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:43:17PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > And those are really all the requirements that the LGPL imposes on
> > source code that is linked to the library to form an executable, but is
> > not part of the l
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> And those are really all the requirements that the LGPL imposes on
> source code that is linked to the library to form an executable, but is
> not part of the library itself -- i.e., not much. It certainly doesn't
> require that the
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 01:00:26PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:28:30PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The specific wording of the GPL grants an exception for linking binaries
> > against GPL-incompatible libraries that are part of the OS, *as long as*
> > your GPL binar
Scripsit Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:28:30PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The specific wording of the GPL grants an exception for linking binaries
> > against GPL-incompatible libraries that are part of the OS, *as long as*
> > your GPL binary is not shipped toge
Hello !
APSL is not considered free by the Free Software Fundation but I haven't
found in the archives of this list anything about the policy of Debian
for this license. Is it considered free enough for Debian ?
I am not on the list, please cc me the answers.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:28:30PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
> The specific wording of the GPL grants an exception for linking binaries
> against GPL-incompatible libraries that are part of the OS, *as long as*
> your GPL binary is not shipped together with your libraries. Debian
> doe
15 matches
Mail list logo
