The Readme for VCG says:
LICENSE CONDITIONS
Copyright (C) 1993--1995 by Iris Lemke, Georg Sander, and
the Compare Consortium
This work is supported by the ESPRIT project 5399 Compare.
We thank the Compare Consortium for the permission to distribute
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 26 Aug 2002 11:58 pm, Ville Muikkula wrote:
>
>> Is this allowed? apsfilterconfig terminates if the user does not accept
>> the license. I am under the impression that the GNU GPL does not permit
>> these kind of additions, that is, requiring p
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:32:47PM -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> [I hope this is the right list for this, please let me know.]
> I've noticed a lot of worrying about things like non-free graphics,
> non-free fonts and non-free documentation. People file bugs saying they
> violate the DFSG and thu
[I hope this is the right list for this, please let me know.]
I've noticed a lot of worrying about things like non-free graphics,
non-free fonts and non-free documentation. People file bugs saying they
violate the DFSG and thus the social contract. Well, there's a more
serious issue here. The
On Monday 26 Aug 2002 11:58 pm, Ville Muikkula wrote:
> Is this allowed? apsfilterconfig terminates if the user does not accept
> the license. I am under the impression that the GNU GPL does not permit
> these kind of additions, that is, requiring physical goods to be sent to
> the software auth
Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 12:11, Walter Landry wrote:
> > What is the current status of the LaTeX License? It seems like the
> > LaTeX people and the Debian people have a fundamental disagreement.
> > Is this the end of things? Is LaTeX going into non-free?
>
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 17:58, Ville Muikkula wrote:
>
> The apsfilter license is a combination of the GNU GPL and postcardware:
>
> "You are permitted to use the apsfilter package in the terms of the GNU
> General Public License. If you use apsfilter for business or home
> purposes, then please
The apsfilter license is a combination of the GNU GPL and postcardware:
"You are permitted to use the apsfilter package in the terms of the GNU
General Public License. If you use apsfilter for business or home
purposes, then please send me a postcard. This product is otherwise free
of charge."
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:54:18AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this license considered DFSG free? The part that seems like it might
> be troublesome is the "The author makes no representations of possessing
> full or partial copyright to the LRC code nor the algorythyms used in this
> mod
CAPT. PAUL DIMANGO.
TEL. 27 73 234 9108.
FAX 27 72 486 3248.
Dear Sir,
URGENT INVESTMENT OFFER
I know you will be surprise to receive this email from me,
but please this letter is a request from
someone in dare need of assistance. I Capt. PAUL DIMANGO from Angola, a
personal aide
to the late
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:13:25AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Is this license considered DFSG free? The part that seems like it might
> > be troublesome is the "The author makes no representations of possessing
> > full or partial copyright to the LRC code nor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Is this license considered DFSG free? The part that seems like it might
> be troublesome is the "The author makes no representations of possessing
> full or partial copyright to the LRC code nor the algorythyms used in this
> module, as said is either public knowledge
Ã
õÃ⽺÷û °Ã³ÃÃà ÃøÃÃà ¸¶ÃÃÃÃ
.a { font-size:9pt; font-family:±¼¸²; color:#4F4F4F}
td { font-size:9pt; font-family:±¼¸²; color:#56596A; line-height:120%;}
a:link { text-decoration: none; color: #56596A; font-size: 9pt;
font-family:"±¼¸²"}
Hello,
We understand you are interested in "genuine" home-based businesses that offer
security and peace of mind, as well as an excellent income.
If this is the case, we sincerely believe we may have just what you are looking
for ... superb incomes from low risk, financially sound companies ba
Is this license considered DFSG free? The part that seems like it might
be troublesome is the "The author makes no representations of possessing
full or partial copyright to the LRC code nor the algorythyms used in this
module, as said is either public knowledge or inspired by multiple
sources."
15 matches
Mail list logo
