Thomas Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2002, Walter Landry wrote:
> > Thomas Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > A question I'm curious about:
> > >
> > > /usr/doc/bible-kjv/copyright and /usr/doc/bible-kjv-text/copyright say:
> > >
> > > : The copyright for the King Jame
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Walter Landry wrote:
> Thomas Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A question I'm curious about:
> >
> > /usr/doc/bible-kjv/copyright and /usr/doc/bible-kjv-text/copyright say:
> >
> > : The copyright for the King James Version text of the Bible is expired
> > : since the t
Thomas Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A question I'm curious about:
>
> /usr/doc/bible-kjv/copyright and /usr/doc/bible-kjv-text/copyright say:
>
> : The copyright for the King James Version text of the Bible is expired
> : since the translation was done in 1611 under King James the first o
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:34:33PM -0400, Mark Horn wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the GPL says that no one can *release*
> a copy of hpoj linked to OpenSSL. They can certainly use hpoj linked
> to OpenSSL. Of course, that doesn't help you as the guy who is trying
> to package up hpoj for
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:00:29PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
>However by the letter of the GPL no one is currently allowed to
>link OpenSSL with hpoj as OpenSSL is not GPL compatible, to allow such
>linking requires express excemption from yourself.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the GPL says th
On 22 May 2002, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> If you are looking for a sample license statement that has been
> considered to be good, you might want to look at the license that the
> authors of CUPS are planning to use. A copy can currently be found at
> http://www.cups.org/new-license.html. It has addi
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 06:00, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2002 10:40, PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote:
> > Hi, Mark. While I don't object to linking with OpenSSL in the manner it's
> > currently done with hpoj (to satistify a libsnmp dependency, where OpenSSL
> > doesn't actually ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 May 2002 10:40, PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote:
> Mark Purcell wrote:
> > OpenSSL (libcrypto) which maybe precluded under the
> > GPL, unless the hpoj licensing terms include a disclamer:
> > http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#L
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [ nessus.org addresses not Cc'ed ]
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:13:15PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > As well, to keep Nessus free, you should also put in a clause allowing
> > anyone else to remove this exemption in their derivative works.
>
> Just
9 matches
Mail list logo
