Re: FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-28 Thread Walter Landry
Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > Because I am putting more and more work into FireBird packages > and they're still not in Debian - I feel the need to be sure > that the packages I create will be DFSG-compliant. It looks fine. The verbiage about patents is not really fr

FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-28 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
Hello! Because I am putting more and more work into FireBird packages and they're still not in Debian - I feel the need to be sure that the packages I create will be DFSG-compliant. Of course I've read the license - 3 times, but IANAL and I want to be sure. I attached the copyright file. FireBir

Re: Opinion needed - included component w/o licensing doc

2002-04-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I'm re-opening a discussion which started at http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200107/msg00026.html in July 2001. I wanted to ask for clarification because metrics is still in woody and unstable and if we cannot distribute it we should remove it before the woody release. (Note