David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > I'm not sure we should worry about history. It's not too much trouble
> > to delete it from all future releases. Give the upstream author a
> > chance first; how long has it been since you asked him a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> I'm not sure we should worry about history. It's not too much trouble
> to delete it from all future releases. Give the upstream author a
> chance first; how long has it been since you asked him about the file?
Less than 48 hours; how long do y
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I think I've convinced myself that oobr.rc just contains a partially-
> filled-in copyright template, and was probably released that way
> by mistake. (The upstream author has not as yet answered my questions.)
That's as well as may be, but it's not in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Is that the actual text of the file?
>
> If so, it seems to assert copyright, but doesn't grant any license.
> We should not be distributing it.
Yes, that's the actual text, but I think it was an upstream
[non]editing error...
Here's the releva
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have subsequently found a copy of the GPL version 1 (in the vm
> source package), and will distribute it in the oo-browser package; so
> the only remaining question is:
>
> David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Q2.: There is *one* file in the source p
I have subsequently found a copy of the GPL version 1 (in the vm
source package), and will distribute it in the oo-browser package; so
the only remaining question is:
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Q2.: There is *one* file in the source package that contains this
> (verbatim):
>
> "Cop
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:56:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > 04:40am [EMAIL PROTECTED]/0 [~/gdb-5.1/gdb/doc] grep -i invariant *.info
> > > gdb.info:Invariant Sections being "A Sample GDB Session" and "Free
> > > Software",
> > > gdbint.info:Invariant Sections being "Algorithms" and "Po
Hi again.
I've just adopted 'oo-browser' which is licensed as follows:
(source file BR-COPY)
===
* Copyright
===
The follow
"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The way I conjecture the license writers intentions; you still can point
> to a rival, forket wpoison project *as long as you don't use the official
> image*; and if you don't like image links, just don't link to the page at
> all (in which case, don't
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:35:48PM +, Sunnanvind wrote:
> Er, no, that's not how you read it. You conjectured just like I did.
> The actual license text says nothing of the sort.
Ehm, yes. That's what I meant. Sorry.
> > Here, I disagree.
> > This is a different situation since in the cas
10 matches
Mail list logo
