Re: GDB manual

2001-12-17 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:07:18AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > 04:40am [EMAIL PROTECTED]/0 [~/gdb-5.1/gdb/doc] grep -i invariant *.info > > gdb.info:Invariant Sections being "A Sample GDB Session" and "Free > > Software", > > gdbint.info:Invariant Sections being "Algorithms" and "Portin

Re: wpoison, is it okay?

2001-12-17 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:35:48PM +, Sunnanvind wrote: > > Like I said, I don't think this is what the copyright holder had in > > mind. I think he means that *if* you use the official logo in an HTML > > document, *then* you must make that HTML document link the official > > logo > > image t

Re: GDB manual

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:36:52AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > What about "Stabs Types" and "Stabs Sections"? (Also GDB.) I can only > > > wonder why whoever did this wanted any of these invariant. (Actually, > > > it might be useful to k

Re: wpoison, is it okay?

2001-12-17 Thread Sunnanvind
> Re-read. It says "the official Wpoison logo itself must be include" > [sic]. So I noticed. I figured it was a typo: a missing "d". I assumed that you figured it was an extra "be ". I do agree with you that the grammar errors should be cleaned up; unambiguity is of course desirable and arguab

Re: GDB manual

2001-12-17 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:36:52AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > What about "Stabs Types" and "Stabs Sections"? (Also GDB.) I can only > > wonder why whoever did this wanted any of these invariant. (Actually, > > it might be useful to know--the first major misuses of GFDL invariant > >

Re: GDB manual

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about "Stabs Types" and "Stabs Sections"? (Also GDB.) I can only > wonder why whoever did this wanted any of these invariant. (Actually, > it might be useful to know--the first major misuses of GFDL invariant > sections. Probably just not readin

Re: wpoison, is it okay?

2001-12-17 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I agree with Branden's analysis of the license provisions you posted, > > but I think he a little overstates the issues with trademarks. In > > general, trademarking a name of a piece of software (and restricting > > the use of the name) has not be

Re: GDB manual

2001-12-17 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 11:49:47PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I asked RMS about the GDB manual. It has two invariant sections, one > of which is a "where to obtain GDB" section; the other is an > introductory tutorial to using GDB. I asked RMS why the latter of > these needed to be inva