Bug#121916: marked as forwarded (analog should be in non-free)

2001-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:23:51 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #121916, regarding analog should be in non-free to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator

FWD: Bug#121916: analog should be in non-free

2001-11-30 Thread Joey Hess
It seems we have to question this license from time to time. I wish it was somthing better understood like the GPL. Anyway, here is the current complaint, with my comments at the end: - Forwarded message from "Dwayne C. Litzenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Package: analog Version: 2:5.1-1

Re: PROPOSED: interpretive guidelines regarding DFSG 3, modifiability, and invariant text

2001-11-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:01:27AM -0700, Richard Stallman wrote: > And you will continue doing that, even when pointed out that this puts > an obstacle to the reuse of technical documentation even among manuals > for free, GPL-licensed software? > > It is not an obstacle--at most a sm

Re: PROPOSED: interpretive guidelines regarding DFSG 3, modifiability, and invariant text

2001-11-30 Thread Richard Stallman
And you will continue doing that, even when pointed out that this puts an obstacle to the reuse of technical documentation even among manuals for free, GPL-licensed software? It is not an obstacle--at most a small detour. And it is very important to spread the word about GNU and free