Re: Libapache-mod-backhand: load balancing Apache requests.

2001-04-19 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, David Starner wrote: > Why are you worried? Trademark law seems fairly simple (for laws), and > "open source" doesn't seem to make a difference here. It's just "We > have this trademark, registered on the 31 of February 2002, they're > using it without permission, and they igno

Re: License for fortunes?

2001-04-19 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Where you get into a problem is where > > someone creates a database/collection that has some type of added value. > Copyright law is designed to protect creative expression. The copyright law of most EU countries has specific language for protectin

Re: Libapache-mod-backhand: load balancing Apache requests.

2001-04-19 Thread Richard Braakman
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:31:53PM -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Richard Braakman wrote: > > Creating such a test would be a lot of work if you don't already > > have one. > > Yes, I'm not thinking of a compatibility test suite. I'm thinking of > things like "All modificati

Re: Libapache-mod-backhand: load balancing Apache requests.

2001-04-19 Thread David Starner
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:31:53PM -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > Is there a document or email somewhere that describes a situation where > Debian has had to enforce its trademarks? Did anything go beyond an email > threat to pursue? I'm just worried that no one's really tried to enforce > a tr