On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Sam Hartman wrote on Sat Mar 10, 2001 um 10:50:37AM:
> > You may force yourself into the GPL without additional permissions
> > solution if you have to modify the software to Debianize it.
>
> That is not my problem. The p
#include
Sam Hartman wrote on Sat Mar 10, 2001 um 10:50:37AM:
> You may force yourself into the GPL without additional permissions
> solution if you have to modify the software to Debianize it.
That is not my problem. The package was rejected because of:
|This package isn't under just the GPL as
You may force yourself into the GPL without additional permissions
solution if you have to modify the software to Debianize it.
Hello,
I still would like to provide upx for Debian and I want to clear the
legality issue now. The LICENSE is attached on this mail.
So, from my point of view, the situation is the following:
The program is distrubuted under GPL. It installs a part of GPLed code
into each file it was applied on
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:52:55PM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> On an additional note, would Stephane Bortzmeyer accept a patch that causes
> dupload to mail a copy of the upload to a list of email addresses before it
> is uploaded? It could be used, for example, to automagically mail a copy to
5 matches
Mail list logo
