Re: libcompface license (again)

On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:56:54AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:32:23AM +1100, James Ashton wrote: > > >Hi, > > >I'm maintaining the debian pkg of your compface lib, and I've talket to you > > >before about it's license. And now ouer legal people have found another > > >pro

Re: Handwaving licence

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:30:32PM +, Paul Martin wrote: > The source tarball contains no copyright notices whatsoever. I'd like to > package this, but suspect that the author's indistinct permission given > above doesn't make the software free. I can report a positive outcome to this one. The

Re: GPL and WINE licence compatible?

Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was about to ITP icoutils (http://www.student.lu.se/~nbi98oli/src/), >but I had a last-minute worry about the licence. It's mostly GPL, except >that some files in the source are distributed under the Wine licence. The upstream author's now released a new

Re: libcompface license (again)

On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:32:23AM +1100, James Ashton wrote: > >Hi, > >I'm maintaining the debian pkg of your compface lib, and I've talket to you > >before about it's license. And now ouer legal people have found another > >problem. The sourcefiles contains a diffrent copyright notice than the >