unknown copyright in tetex

2001-02-09 Thread Anton Zinoviev
Hi! According to /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/copyright: > The teTeX distribution is free software, you can redistribute it > and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License ... > ... And also: > The individual parts of this distribution often have their own > copyright. Please

Bug#85401: ssh in non-us/non-free?

2001-02-09 Thread Brian Ristuccia
Package: ssh Version: 1:2.2.0p1-1.1 Is there any reason why OpenSSH needs to be in non-free now that the RSA patent has expired? Also, does it even need to be in non-us now that US crypto regulations have been revised? -- Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Can Caml Light and MoscowML be in debian now?

2001-02-09 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:27:21PM -0500, Bonard B. Timmons III wrote: > > But according to this licensing page(*), it is now clear that Caml > > Light will be licensed similarly to Ocaml. Therefore, it and MoscowML > > can now be included in Debian. >