On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:53:10AM -0500, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> jerome.marant said:
> >
> > When looking at the opensource.org page, I discovered that the Vovida
> > Licence (http://www.vovida.org/licence.html) is considered as
> > OSD compliant.
> >
> > However, the fourth clause tells that
> >
jerome.marant said:
>
> When looking at the opensource.org page, I discovered that the Vovida
> Licence (http://www.vovida.org/licence.html) is considered as
> OSD compliant.
>
> However, the fourth clause tells that
> "4. Products derived from this software may not be called "VOCAL", nor
> m
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> "4. Products derived from this software may not be called "VOCAL", nor
> may "VOCAL" appear in their name, without prior written
> permission."
>
> Is this compatible with the third clause of the DFSG ? It looks like a
> restriction on the di
When looking at the opensource.org page, I discovered that the Vovida
Licence (http://www.vovida.org/licence.html) is considered as
OSD compliant.
However, the fourth clause tells that
"4. Products derived from this software may not be called "VOCAL", nor
may "VOCAL" appear in their name, wit
4 matches
Mail list logo