On 23-Apr-00, 09:57 (CDT), Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 01:15:29PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> just wanted to discuss the ability to "misinterpret" the DFSG Par. 9
> and possibly working creativly on a change for the terminology
> making it more clear wha
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > > Read your quote: "License Must Not Contaminate Other Software"
On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:25:50AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Excuse me, but what about that quote makes it illegal for a license
> > to license the software that
Steve Greenland wrote:
> A reading of the complete GPL, along with RMS's other writings, not to
> mention the gigabytes of commentary and clarification that have been
> written since the GPL's release make it clear that GPL is intended to
> apply only to the licencsed software itself and derived w
On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:25:50AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > Read your quote: "License Must Not Contaminate Other Software"
>
> Excuse me, but what about that quote makes it illegal for a license to
> license the software tha
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> Read your quote: "License Must Not Contaminate Other Software"
Excuse me, but what about that quote makes it illegal for a license to
license the software that it licenses for distribution?
$ dict other
1 definition found
>From Wo
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 01:15:29PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Likewise, the intent of the DFSG is clearly to allow the combined
^^
> distribution of independent works on the same media or from the same
^^
> (vi
6 matches
Mail list logo
